Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse emphasizes God's love and salvation for humankind, contrasting with the destruction language in Ezekiel 28:16.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with James 1:13
States that God does not tempt anyone with evil, which contrasts the idea of corruption and sin found in Ezekiel 28:16.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Romans 5:20
Speaks of grace abounding where sin increased, contrasting with the casting out due to sin in Ezekiel 28:16.
Romans 5:20: Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
Contradiction with 1 John 1:9
Assures forgiveness if we confess sins, contrasting with the immediate consequence of sin seen in Ezekiel 28:16.
1 John 1:9: If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:18
Offers reasoning and forgiveness from God, unlike the judgment depicted in Ezekiel 28:16.
Isaiah 1:18: Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 28:16 could be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency because it describes a figure who is traditionally interpreted as either the King of Tyre or Lucifer (Satan) being cast out due to pride and sin. Some people see a conflict between this portrayal and other parts of the Bible that describe the nature and origin of evil, the role of free will, and the fall of Satan. These interpretations can vary widely and lead to differing theological understandings.
Paradox #2
Ezekiel 28:16 may seem to display a contradiction or inconsistency in the sense that it discusses judgment and punishment for a being who was once in a high and perfect position. This might appear inconsistent with the idea of a perfectly created being falling into wrongdoing. Additionally, it could conflict with the concept of divine justice or the nature of created beings remaining in their original state of goodness. However, these interpretations often depend on theological perspectives and the broader context within the Bible.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Ezekiel 28:16 might arise from the idea that it portrays a being, often interpreted as a fallen angel or a representation of pride and corruption, being punished with destruction or expulsion. This could conflict with the concept of forgiveness and redemption found elsewhere in religious teachings. The tension lies in the balance between justice and mercy.