Contradiction with Hebrews 10:26
This verse suggests that if we sin willfully after knowing the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, conflicting with the idea of turning from sin and being spared.
Hebrews 10:26: For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Contradiction with Romans 11:29
This verse states that God's gifts and call are irrevocable, suggesting a different view from the conditional turning in Ezekiel 33:14.
Romans 11:29: For the gifts and calling of God [are] without repentance.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:14
States that whatever God does shall be forever, nothing can be added to it, nor anything taken from it, contrasting with the change mentioned in Ezekiel 33:14.
Ecclesiastes 3:14: I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth [it], that [men] should fear before him.
Contradiction with Matthew 12:32
Suggests that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, presenting a contradiction to the idea of sin being forgiven upon turning from it.
Matthew 12:32: And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the [world] to come.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:29
States that God does not lie or change His mind, implying constancy as opposed to conditional action based on human repentance as in Ezekiel 33:14.
1 Samuel 15:29: And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he [is] not a man, that he should repent. [Strength: or, Eternity, or, Victory]
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 33:14 could present a theological inconsistency related to the idea of justice and repentance. Some might argue that if God allows a wicked person to live if they turn away from their sins, it could seem unfair to those who have always been righteous. This raises questions about whether last-minute repentance is as valued as lifelong righteousness, and how justice is balanced with mercy.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be the idea of fairness and justice. Some might see it as inconsistent because it suggests that a person who has done wrong can avoid punishment simply by changing their behavior, which could feel unfair to those who have suffered from their actions. It raises questions about whether it's just to forgive past wrongs if someone decides to act differently, and how this aligns with accountability and consequences for actions.