Contradiction with Proverbs 11:24
Proverbs 11:24 speaks of the one who gives freely yet gains more, in contrast to Ezekiel 34:3 which denounces leaders who take for themselves without aiding others.
Proverbs 11:24: There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth; and [there is] that withholdeth more than is meet, but [it tendeth] to poverty.
Contradiction with Acts 20:35
Acts 20:35 emphasizes giving and helping the weak, opposing Ezekiel 34:3 where leaders are criticized for exploiting the flock instead of nurturing them.
Acts 20:35: I have shewed you all things, how that so labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:4
Philippians 2:4 urges looking to the interests of others, in contradiction to the selfish actions described in Ezekiel 34:3.
Philippians 2:4: Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:11
Matthew 23:11 extols servanthood as greatness, contrasting with the selfish leadership criticized in Ezekiel 34:3.
Matthew 23:11: But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
Contradiction with 1 John 3:17
1 John 3:17 challenges those who possess goods to aid the needy, which contradicts Ezekiel 34:3's rebuke of those who take without giving.
1 John 3:17: But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 34:3 criticizes leaders who neglect and exploit their people. A possible doctrinal inconsistency could be seen when comparing it to parts of the Bible that depict God appointing leaders and encouraging people to trust and obey them, such as in Romans 13:1-2. This might seem conflicting because it criticizes leaders in one part while urging obedience to them in another. However, it can be understood that the Bible supports good, just leadership rather than corrupt practices.
Paradox #2
This verse criticizes leaders who take care of themselves but neglect their followers. The contradiction could be that leaders are expected to care for their people, but when they prioritize their own needs instead, it conflicts with the ethical duty of leadership and responsibility.