Contradiction with Matthew 5:7
While Ezekiel 34:4 condemns those who fail to care for the weak, Matthew 5:7 emphasizes the blessedness of being merciful and compassionate.
Matthew 5:7: Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Contradiction with James 2:15-17
Ezekiel 34:4 speaks against neglecting those in need, whereas James 2:15-17 stresses the necessity of providing for those in need as an expression of faith.
James 2:15-17: If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,
Contradiction with Isaiah 58:6-7
Ezekiel 34:4 criticizes failing to support the vulnerable, while Isaiah 58:6-7 highlights the righteous actions of helping the needy, thus contrasting those actions Ezekiel criticizes.
Isaiah 58:6-7: [Is] not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke? [the heavy...: Heb. the bundles of the yoke] [oppressed: Heb. broken]
Contradiction with 1 John 3:17
Ezekiel 34:4 reproaches not aiding the afflicted, whereas 1 John 3:17 questions the love of God in someone who does not help a brother in need, thereby underscoring the expectation to do so.
1 John 3:17: But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?
Contradiction with Proverbs 21:13
While Ezekiel 34:4 chastises the inaction towards the oppressed, Proverbs 21:13 warns that ignoring the cries of the poor will result in not being heard in one's own time of need, thus highlighting expected benevolence.
Proverbs 21:13: Whoso stoppeth his ears at the cry of the poor, he also shall cry himself, but shall not be heard.
Contradiction with Luke 10:33-34
Ezekiel 34:4 criticizes the lack of care for the ill and injured; in contrast, Luke 10:33-34 presents the Good Samaritan's compassionate actions as the ideal response to such neglect.
Luke 10:33-34: But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion [on him],
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 34:4 highlights the failure of leaders to care for their people. A potential contradiction might arise when compared to verses that emphasize God’s unfailing guidance and care, suggesting that leaders chosen by God should reflect His attributes. If leaders fail, it could be viewed as inconsistent with the idea of divine selection and guidance.
Paradox #2
Ezekiel 34:4 talks about the failure of leaders to care for their people. A possible contradiction or conflict could arise when religious or community leaders, who are supposed to embody these teachings, do not actually care for or help their communities. This inconsistency between the teachings and actions could lead to a loss of trust or faith in leaders or the system they represent.