Contradiction with Hosea 3:4-5
These verses indicate the children of Israel will be without a king for many days, a contrast to having one shepherd, David, ruling over them as stated in Ezekiel 37:24.
Hosea 3:4-5: For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice, and without an image, and without an ephod, and [without] teraphim: [image: Heb. a standing, or, statue, or, pillar]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 30:9
This verse confirms rather than contradicts Ezekiel 37:24 by mentioning that Israel will serve David, their king, similar to Ezekiel's prophecy, rather than presenting a contradiction.
Jeremiah 30:9: But they shall serve the LORD their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 22:30
This verse declares that no man of Jehoiachin’s descendants will prosper sitting on the throne of David, contradicting the notion of a "David" to rule forever.
Jeremiah 22:30: Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man [that] shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.
Contradiction with Hosea 13:11
This verse suggests God gave Israel a king in anger and took him away in wrath, which contradicts the peaceful and eternal rule implied in Ezekiel 37:24.
Hosea 13:11: I gave thee a king in mine anger, and took [him] away in my wrath.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 8:7
It implies that the people rejected God as their king when they asked for a human king, contrasting with the divine approval of a king as described in Ezekiel 37:24.
1 Samuel 8:7: And the LORD said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding Ezekiel 37:24 relates to the prophecy about a future leader, often understood as referring to King David ruling over Israel. The issue arises because this was written long after King David's death, so there is debate over whether it refers to a literal resurrection, a future leader from David's lineage, or is meant metaphorically. This creates different interpretations and some confusion among scholars and religious groups.