Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
It talks about turning swords into plowshares, a vision of peace, contrasting with Ezekiel 39:9's burning of weapons.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Jesus tells Peter to put away his sword, promoting peace rather than using or discarding weapons.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Micah 4:3
It speaks of beating swords into plowshares, indicating a cessation of war, opposite to the implications of ongoing conflict in Ezekiel 39:9.
Micah 4:3: And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19
Encourages believers not to seek vengeance, contradicting the celebration of destroying weapons as spoils of war.
Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Isaiah 11:6-9
Describes a peaceful kingdom without harm or destruction, contradicting the burning of war implements in Ezekiel 39:9.
Isaiah 11:6-9: The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Ezekiel 39:9 might arise when comparing it to other biblical passages that emphasize peace and the absence of war-related activities. Ezekiel 39:9 discusses the use of weapons for fuel, which could be seen as inconsistent with the idea of a time when weapons are no longer needed or used, such as in prophecies about a future peaceful kingdom. This poses a tension between interpretations of literal and symbolic fulfillment of prophetic peace.
Paradox #2
The scientific inconsistency in the verse involves the concept of burning weapons for fuel for an extended period. In reality, many materials used in weapons, such as metals, do not produce sustainable energy when burned and are not practical as fuel sources. This idea contradicts what we understand about the properties of metals and combustion.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Ezekiel 39:9 may arise from the idea of using weapons from a defeated army as fuel or resources. Some might see this as inconsistent with ideals of peace or reconciliation, as it involves taking advantage of violent conflict rather than promoting healing or rebuilding in a non-violent way.