Contradictions and Paradoxes in Ezekiel 48:32

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Ezekiel 48:32 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Ezekiel 48:32. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Ezekiel, this verse talks about a special city where each side has gates named after different important people from long ago. These gates are for the families of Joseph, Benjamin, and Dan.

Ezekiel 48:32: And at the east side four thousand and five hundred: and three gates; and one gate of Joseph, one gate of Benjamin, one gate of Dan.

Contradiction with Revelation 21:12

This verse describes the gates of New Jerusalem also having the names of the twelve tribes, but the context and vision differ from the land allocation in Ezekiel 48:32.

Revelation 21:12: And had a wall great and high, [and] had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are [the names] of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:

Contradiction with Joshua 13:1-7

Mentions the division of land among the tribes but may name different cities or allocations compared to the vision of the city gates in Ezekiel 48:32.

Joshua 13:1-7: Now Joshua was old [and] stricken in years; and the LORD said unto him, Thou art old [and] stricken in years, and there remaineth yet very much land to be possessed. [to...: Heb. to possess it]

Contradiction with Numbers 26:52-56

Lists a different manner or division of inheritance among the tribes, contradicting the order and specific identification mentioned in Ezekiel 48:32.

Numbers 26:52-56: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

Contradiction with Genesis 49:1-28

Offers a different vision or prophecy related to the tribes of Israel that may not align directly with the specific city gate names of Ezekiel 48:32.

Genesis 49:1-28: And Jacob called unto his sons, and said, Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you [that] which shall befall you in the last days.
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information provided.