Contradiction with Matthew 19:26
Ezekiel 4:8 suggests restriction on human freedom, while Matthew 19:26 states that with God, all things are possible, implying no limitations.
Matthew 19:26: But Jesus beheld [them], and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
Contradiction with Philippians 4:13
Ezekiel 4:8 describes a limitation, whereas Philippians 4:13 emphasizes the ability to do all things through Christ, suggesting no restrictions.
Philippians 4:13: I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:1
Ezekiel 4:8 mentions bondage, while Galatians 5:1 speaks of standing firm in the freedom given by Christ, contradicting the concept of being bound.
Galatians 5:1: Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 3:17
Ezekiel 4:8 talks about bondage, but 2 Corinthians 3:17 mentions that where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty, opposing the idea of being bound.
2 Corinthians 3:17: Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord [is], there [is] liberty.
Contradiction with John 8:36
Ezekiel 4:8 speaks of being bound, while John 8:36 states that if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed, contrasting the notion of being restrained.
John 8:36: If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict with Ezekiel 4:8 could relate to the idea of God restricting free will by binding Ezekiel. Some might question how this action aligns with the concept of free will that is often highlighted in other parts of the Bible, where individuals are usually entrusted to make their own choices. However, this instance can be seen more as a symbolic act rather than a literal take on everyday human choice, and it's part of a larger prophetic action to convey a message to the people of Israel.
Paradox #2
Ezekiel 4:8 might present a moral conflict by depicting a situation where God commands a prophet to endure difficult conditions as part of a symbolic act. This could raise questions about the fairness or compassion of putting someone through hardship for a symbolic message, potentially conflicting with views of a loving and caring deity.