Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:16
This verse commands honoring your parents, which contradicts the act of children eating their parents.
Deuteronomy 5:16: Honour thy father and thy mother, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee; that thy days may be prolonged, and that it may go well with thee, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
The commandment "Thou shalt not kill" opposes the violence inherent in cannibalism described in Ezekiel 5:10.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
The directive to love your neighbor as yourself contradicts the act of consuming one's offspring or parents.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:39
The command to love your neighbor also implies caring for one's own family, contradicting familial cannibalism.
Matthew 22:39: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Romans 12:10
This instruction to show brotherly love opposes the extreme violence and lack of familial care described.
Romans 12:10: [Be] kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another; [with...: or, in the love of the brethren]
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 5:10 could present a contradiction or conflict by showcasing an instance of extreme divine judgment that may seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize God's mercy and compassion. This could lead to questions about the balance between justice and mercy in God's character. However, interpretations can vary, and many theologians view such passages as part of a larger narrative about the consequences of disobedience and the eventual hope for redemption.
Paradox #2
Historical contradiction or conflict with Ezekiel 5:10 could arise from its depiction of extreme actions, which some might find inconsistent with other biblical themes of mercy and compassion. Such passages can be hard to reconcile with the broader narrative of moral teachings. However, interpretations vary, and some view these verses contextually as symbolic or hyperbolic to convey a message about consequences.
Paradox #3
Ezekiel 5:10 describes a scenario of extreme distress that could imply acts like cannibalism. From a scientific perspective, this is inconsistent with human nutritional needs and social behavior norms. Cannibalism is generally harmful due to psychological and health risks, such as disease transmission. Additionally, humans naturally develop social norms against such practices for survival and community health.
Paradox #4
Ezekiel 5:10 describes a harsh judgment where severe consequences are meted out, which can create a contradiction or conflict with the concept of a compassionate and forgiving deity. This depiction of extreme punishment might seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize mercy and love.