Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Ezekiel 9:4 involves marking for protection those who mourn for sin, whereas Matthew 5:44 instructs to love enemies, highlighting a teaching of universal love and forgiveness rather than selective protection or judgment.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with John 3:16
Ezekiel 9:4 depicts a specific marking for protection related to sin, whereas John 3:16 emphasizes a promise of salvation and love for "whosoever" believes, stressing inclusivity rather than selective marking.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Ezekiel 9:4 involves a mark of mercy based on mourning for sin, whereas James 2:13 stresses that mercy triumphs over judgment, suggesting mercy should be extended universally, not just to a select few.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 10:13
Ezekiel 9:4 describes a selective marking for protection, while Romans 10:13 states that "whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved," promoting a more inclusive approach to salvation.
Romans 10:13: For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Ezekiel 9:4 involves marking for protection based on specific criteria, while 1 John 4:8 states that "God is love," implying that divine love is unconditional and not restricted to particular groups.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction with Ezekiel 9:4 is the idea of a merciful God versus a God who commands wrath. The verse describes marking a group of people for protection from coming judgment, which implies that those not marked will face destruction. This could seem inconsistent with the concept of a God who is loving and merciful to all. It raises questions about divine justice and why some are spared while others are not.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could be the command to mark certain people for protection while others are not and face consequences. This might raise questions about fairness or why some people are chosen for protection over others based on specific criteria.