Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Ezekiel 9:6 commands the execution of people without mercy, whereas Matthew 5:44 instructs to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Ezekiel 9:6 includes killing as part of God's judgment, contradicting the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" in Exodus 20:13.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Ezekiel 9:6 involves judgment without mercy, while James 2:13 says that mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Ezekiel 9:6 depicts direct vengeance and judgment, whereas Romans 12:19 advises to leave vengeance to God and to not repay evil for evil.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Ezekiel 9:6 is about executing judgment, contradicting Ezekiel 18:32 where God says He takes no pleasure in the death of anyone.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Paradox #1
The idea of God commanding the killing of individuals, including children, seems to conflict with the understanding of God as loving and compassionate. This raises questions about consistency in God's nature, as represented in different parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction or conflict with Ezekiel 9:6 could be related to the contrast between the harsh judgment depicted in the verse and the teachings of love, mercy, and forgiveness found in other parts of the Bible, especially in the New Testament. This may raise questions about the nature of God's justice and mercy.
Paradox #3
The conflict in this context could arise from the moral and ethical implications of the directive in the verse, which modern principles of human rights and ethics might find troubling. It involves actions that contradict contemporary values of compassion and the protection of all individuals, especially the innocent. This can lead to debates about the morality of the actions described, as they do not align with current understandings of justice and humanitarian principles.
Paradox #4
This verse may present a contradiction because it involves the command to harm people, including innocent ones such as children and the elderly. This seems to conflict with the broader moral teachings of kindness, compassion, and the value of human life found elsewhere in the Bible.