Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39
These verses contradict Ezra 7:26's call for punishment by advocating turning the other cheek instead of seeking retribution.
Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse emphasizes mercy over judgment, contradicting the harsh punishment described in Ezra 7:26.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1-2
Advocates against judgment to avoid being judged, which is in contrast to the executions and punishments in Ezra 7:26.
Matthew 7:1-2: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises leaving vengeance to God, contrasting with the justice executed by man as instructed in Ezra 7:26.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with John 8:7
Suggests that only those without sin should cast the first stone, opposing the idea of human-administered punishment mentioned in Ezra 7:26.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Paradox #1
Ezra 7:26 could raise concerns about the balance between mercy and justice in religious laws, as it emphasizes strict enforcement of laws with severe punishments without mentioning mercy or redemption. Some people might see this as conflicting with the broader biblical themes of forgiveness and compassion.
Paradox #2
Ezra 7:26 could be seen as conflicting with the New Testament teachings on forgiveness and grace. In the New Testament, especially in the teachings of Jesus, there is a strong emphasis on forgiveness, mercy, and not judging or punishing others harshly. However, the verse in Ezra speaks about strict enforcement of law and punishment. This contrast between Old Testament justice and New Testament grace could be viewed as a doctrinal inconsistency.
Paradox #3
Ezra 7:26 might show a contradiction regarding the application of law and authority because it emphasizes strict adherence to both God's law and the king's law. There might be tension or inconsistency for Jews living under foreign rule since these laws could conflict, and deciding which to prioritize could be a challenge.
Paradox #4
Ezra 7:26 could be seen as having a moral conflict because it talks about punishing people severely if they don't follow certain laws. This raises questions about compassion and forgiveness, which are important values in other parts of religious teachings. Using strict punishment might seem at odds with promoting forgiveness and understanding.