Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
These verses contradict Galatians 2:12 because Acts 10:34-35 emphasize that God shows no favoritism and accepts those from every nation who fear Him, contrasting with Peter's prior behavior of separating from Gentiles.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-15
These verses contradict Galatians 2:12 as they describe Christ breaking down the dividing wall of hostility between Jews and Gentiles, contrary to Peter's withdrawal from Gentiles.
Ephesians 2:14-15: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with Acts 15:8-9
This passage contradicts Galatians 2:12 because it emphasizes that God makes no distinction between Jews and Gentiles, purifying their hearts by faith, opposing Peter's segregation from Gentiles.
Acts 15:8-9: And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as [he did] unto us;
Contradiction with Romans 10:12
This verse contradicts Galatians 2:12 by stating there is no difference between Jew and Greek, as the same Lord is rich to all who call on Him, opposing Peter's withdrawal from Gentiles.
Romans 10:12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
This verse contradicts Galatians 2:12 as it declares there is no Greek or Jew, promoting unity in Christ, challenging Peter's separation from Gentiles.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in Galatians 2:12 could arise from the conflict between Jewish law and Christian freedom. This verse highlights a moment where some early Christians, who were formerly Jewish, struggled with whether they should continue to follow Jewish customs. This created tension between holding onto old traditions and embracing the new faith that emphasized freedom from these laws. This tension can be seen as a conflict between adhering strictly to religious laws and accepting the more inclusive and liberating message of Christianity.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Galatians 2:12 could be about Paul confronting Peter for not eating with Gentile Christians due to pressure from certain Jewish Christians. This incident highlights a conflict within early Christianity about whether Gentile converts should follow Jewish laws, especially around food. It shows inconsistency in following the teachings of accepting all believers equally, regardless of cultural or religious background.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Galatians 2:12 could be seen in the way it addresses hypocrisy. It highlights how someone may change their behavior based on peer pressure or fear of judgment, rather than sticking to what they believe is right. This inconsistency in actions versus beliefs can be seen as a moral conflict.