Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter states that God shows no partiality and accepts everyone who fears Him and does what is right, contradicting his behavior in Galatians 2:14 where he separated himself from Gentiles.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Matthew 28:19-20
Jesus commands to make disciples of all nations, supporting inclusion, contrasting Peter’s withdrawal from Gentiles in Galatians 2:14.
Matthew 28:19-20: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: [teach...: or, make disciples, or, Christians of all nations]
Contradiction with Acts 15:8-9
God gave the Holy Spirit to Gentiles and purified their hearts, contrary to Peter's refusal to eat with them in Galatians 2:14.
Acts 15:8-9: And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as [he did] unto us;
Contradiction with Romans 3:29-30
Paul emphasizes that God is the God of both Jews and Gentiles, disagreeing with the separation Peter practices in Galatians 2:14.
Romans 3:29-30: [Is he] the God of the Jews only? [is he] not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14
Christ has broken down the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles, counter to Peter's actions of segregation in Galatians 2:14.
Ephesians 2:14: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Paradox #1
Theological contradiction or conflict with the verse might arise because Paul is pointing out a situation where someone is not acting in line with the message of being unified in faith despite cultural or religious backgrounds. This could be seen as inconsistent if one believes Christian teachings should always align perfectly without conflict among leaders, showcasing the human element in interpretation and practice of faith.
Paradox #2
Galatians 2:14 highlights a situation where Paul confronts Peter for not acting consistently with the truth of the gospel, specifically criticizing him for compelling Gentile converts to follow Jewish customs. The potential conflict here is with the idea of salvation being through faith alone, as seen in other parts of the New Testament, versus the expectation of adhering to certain laws or customs. This confrontation may seem inconsistent with the unity and equality promoted by the gospel message.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in that verse could relate to the disagreement between two early Christian leaders about Jewish laws. One leader was not acting consistently with what he preached, creating a conflict over whether non-Jewish Christians should follow Jewish customs. This contradiction highlights early challenges in defining Christian identity.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Galatians 2:14 could be seen in the context of hypocrisy. The conflict arises when someone does not practice what they preach or behave differently from the standards they impose on others. This inconsistency can be seen as a moral issue because it highlights a lack of integrity or honesty in their actions compared to their words.