Contradiction with James 2:24
James 2:24 emphasizes justification by works, contradicting Galatians 2:17, which dismisses works of the law in justification.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Romans 3:28
Romans 3:28 states a man is justified by faith without works, which seems to align on the surface but contradicts how Galatians addresses that Christ isn't promoting sin.
Romans 3:28: Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17-18
Jesus in Matthew 5:17-18 upholds the law, whereas Galatians 2:17 discusses freedom from the law in terms of justification.
Matthew 5:17-18: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with 1 John 3:6
1 John 3:6 claims no one who abides in Him sins, contradicting Galatians 2:17 where seeking justification by Christ may imply sin.
1 John 3:6: Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
Contradiction with James 2:10
James 2:10 asserts that failing in one point of the law means breaking all, contradicting belief in Christ not promoting sin in Galatians.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction in Galatians 2:17 is the concern that if seeking to be justified by Christ leads believers to sin, it could imply that Christ promotes sin. This seems inconsistent because the Christian belief is that Christ leads people away from sin, not towards it. This confusion arises because justification by faith in Christ might be seen to allow moral laxity, yet true Christian teaching emphasizes transformation and righteous living.
Paradox #2
Galatians 2:17 could be seen as having a contradiction because it raises the question of whether seeking to be justified in Christ might imply that Christ promotes sin if believers are found to be sinners. This could seem inconsistent with the idea that Christ is wholly righteous and opposes sin. The challenge is understanding how faith in Christ leads to righteousness without suggesting that He encourages sinful behavior.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency around this text might be related to its theological interpretation and its impact on early Christian debates about law and grace. Some might find it contradictory in terms of whether following Jesus allows believers to dismiss the Jewish law, thereby questioning the role of law versus faith in salvation. This could lead to conflicting views about the expectations of Christian behavior and observance of Jewish customs.
Paradox #4
Galatians 2:17 might pose a conflict because it suggests that seeking to be justified by Christ could somehow make Christ an agent of sin, which seems contradictory. It raises questions about whether following Christ could inadvertently lead to sin or wrongdoing, contradicting the belief that Christ leads one away from sin. This can create confusion about how faith and actions align.