Contradiction with Romans 7:15
This verse describes the internal struggle with sin, whereas Galatians 5:24 emphasizes crucifying the flesh with its passions and desires.
Romans 7:15: For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. [allow: Gr. know]
Contradiction with Romans 7:18-19
Romans emphasizes the inability to do good because of the sinful nature, which seems to contradict the decisive act of crucifixion of the flesh in Galatians 5:24.
Romans 7:18-19: For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but [how] to perform that which is good I find not.
Contradiction with Romans 7:22-23
Paul speaks of delighting in God's law but being captive to sin in his flesh, contrasting with the idea of crucified passions in Galatians 5:24.
Romans 7:22-23: For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Contradiction with 1 John 1:8
This verse declares that claiming to be without sin is self-deception, which contradicts the notion in Galatians 5:24 of having decisively crucified the flesh with its sins.
1 John 1:8: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 7:20
It states that no righteous person is entirely sin-free, conflicting with the idea in Galatians 5:24 of defeating sinful nature.
Ecclesiastes 7:20: For [there is] not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
Contradiction with Philippians 3:12
Paul admits he has not already obtained perfection, which contrasts with the notion in Galatians 5:24 of having fully crucified the sinful nature.
Philippians 3:12: Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction or inconsistency regarding Galatians 5:24 might arise from its message about followers of Jesus needing to set aside their old sinful ways. Some people might see this as conflicting with historical accounts or other parts of the Bible where certain biblical figures—even faithful ones—continue to struggle with sin or imperfections without completely overcoming them. This could lead to discussions about the nature of spiritual transformation and the realistic expectations for believers.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict with the verse could arise if someone believes that the natural desires and emotions of humans, which are seen as a part of being human, should not be entirely suppressed. They might argue that this perspective conflicts with the idea of embracing human nature and fostering personal growth through understanding and managing desires rather than eliminating them completely.