Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse states that Jesus did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it, which contrasts with the act of dividing animals in Genesis 15:10, as animal sacrifice becomes unnecessary with Christ's fulfillment.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Psalm 51:16
This verse emphasizes that God does not delight in sacrifice, which contradicts the ritualistic animal division in Genesis 15:10.
Psalm 51:16: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
This verse questions the purpose of numerous sacrifices, which opposes the ritual in Genesis 15:10 of dividing animals.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Contradiction with Micah 6:6-8
These verses highlight that God desires justice and mercy over animal sacrifices, contradictory to the division of animals in Genesis 15:10.
Micah 6:6-8: Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, [and] bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? [of a...: Heb. sons of a year?]
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:8-10
These verses state that God takes no pleasure in burnt offerings and sacrifices and highlights the new covenant, contradicting the sacrificial act in Genesis 15:10.
Hebrews 10:8-10: Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and [offering] for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure [therein]; which are offered by the law;