Contradiction with Matthew 19:6
This verse implies that what God joins together (marriage), humans should not separate, contrasting with Sarah's suggestion to Abram to have a child with Hagar.
Matthew 19:6: Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:2
This verse advises against having sexual relations outside of marriage, suggesting each man should have his own wife, which contradicts Sarah's proposal.
1 Corinthians 7:2: Nevertheless, [to avoid] fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:4
This verse emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and faithfulness, contrasting with Sarah's encouragement for Abram to conceive with another woman.
Hebrews 13:4: Marriage [is] honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.
Contradiction with Mark 10:9
Similar to Matthew 19:6, this verse emphasizes that no one should separate what God has joined together, conflicting with Sarah's suggestion to Abram.
Mark 10:9: What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:14
As part of the Ten Commandments, it prohibits adultery, which opposes Sarah's suggestion to involve Hagar in their marital affair.
Exodus 20:14: Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Paradox #1
Genesis 16:2 might raise questions about faith and human intervention. The verse shows Sarai suggesting to Abram that he have a child with her maid, Hagar, to fulfill God's promise of offspring. This could be seen as a lack of faith in God's timing or promise, as they take matters into their own hands instead of waiting for God's plan. It could be perceived as inconsistent with the idea of trusting God's promises completely.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal inconsistency in Genesis 16:2 could be seen in the context of faith and God's promises. This verse involves taking human action to fulfill God's promise, which can be seen as contradicting the idea of trusting in God's timing and plan. It showcases a conflict between acting on human understanding versus relying on divine guidance.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction regarding the situation described is the social and cultural norms of the time concerning family and heirs. In ancient times, the practice of having a child through a servant might have been socially acceptable, but it also led to complex family dynamics and conflicts, as later seen in the story. Additionally, it could raise questions about the emphasis on lineage and the role of women in these narratives.
Paradox #4
Genesis 16:2 might be seen as presenting a contradiction or inconsistency related to faith and human intervention. The verse involves Sarai suggesting that Abram have a child with her maidservant Hagar because Sarai cannot conceive. This can be viewed as conflicting because, on one hand, there is belief in God's promise, yet on the other hand, there is a lack of trust that leads to human intervention instead of waiting for divine timing. It raises questions about faith, impatience, and taking matters into one's own hands rather than relying on divine promises.