Contradiction with Galatians 5:2
This verse opposes the necessity of circumcision, stating that if you accept circumcision, Christ will profit you nothing, contradicting Genesis 17:12's requirement for circumcision.
Galatians 5:2: Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
Contradiction with Romans 2:28-29
These verses imply that true circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter, thus contradicting Genesis 17:12's physical circumcision requirement.
Romans 2:28-29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Contradiction with Galatians 6:15
This verse emphasizes that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but only being a new creation, contradicting the physical requirement in Genesis 17:12.
Galatians 6:15: For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:18-19
These verses state that circumcision is nothing and keeping God's commandments is what matters, contradicting the necessity of circumcision in Genesis 17:12.
1 Corinthians 7:18-19: Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
Paradox #1
Genesis 17:12 could present a theological conflict in discussions about the requirement of circumcision as a sign of God's covenant with Abraham's descendants. Some might see this as inconsistent with later Christian teachings, particularly those of the New Testament, which suggest that faith and inner transformation are more important than physical rituals. This could be viewed as a contradiction between Old Testament laws and the New Testament emphasis on spiritual faith over traditional Jewish customs.
Paradox #2
Genesis 17:12 talks about circumcision as a covenant, which is a practice specific to certain religious and cultural groups. A potential contradiction might involve the archaeological and historical evidence showing diverse practices and beliefs among ancient peoples, not all of whom practiced circumcision. Additionally, contradictions can arise when comparing how different religious traditions interpret and adopt this practice over time, sometimes leading to disagreements within or between communities.
Paradox #3
The verse talks about circumcision on the eighth day after birth. Some people might see a conflict with modern medical practices, as circumcision isn't always medically necessary and is sometimes debated regarding health benefits and ethical considerations. However, from a scientific perspective, the eighth day is when Vitamin K levels are naturally higher in newborns, aiding blood clotting, which may align with the timing from a health standpoint. So, there might not be a direct contradiction, but there could be differing views on necessity and ethics.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict might arise from the practice of circumcision, especially when applied to infants who cannot consent. Some people may see this as conflicting with modern views on bodily autonomy and the rights of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies. Additionally, some argue it may go against the idea of gentleness and non-harm, as circumcision is a surgical procedure.