Contradiction with Galatians 5:6
Emphasizes that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value, contradicting the necessity of circumcision stated in Genesis 17:14.
Galatians 5:6: For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Contradiction with Romans 2:28-29
States that true circumcision is a matter of the heart, not the flesh, opposing the physical requirement in Genesis 17:14.
Romans 2:28-29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:18-19
Advises that circumcision is nothing, and keeping God's commandments is what counts, contrasting with the exclusionary mandate of Genesis 17:14.
1 Corinthians 7:18-19: Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
Contradiction with Galatians 6:15
Asserts that being a new creation is what matters, not circumcision, which goes against the command in Genesis 17:14.
Galatians 6:15: For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict with Genesis 17:14 could arise from the tension between the Old Testament law requiring circumcision and the New Testament teachings emphasizing faith over law for salvation. In the New Testament, particularly in the letters of Paul, there's a strong emphasis on faith in Jesus Christ as the path to salvation, rather than adherence to the Mosaic Law, including circumcision. This can create a perceived inconsistency for some readers between the Old Testament requirements and the New Testament teachings on grace and faith.
Paradox #2
Genesis 17:14 might seem to present a contradiction when considering the broader Biblical message of salvation by faith and grace. The verse suggests that failure to follow a specific physical ritual could lead to being cut off from God's people, which might appear inconsistent with later teachings, particularly in the New Testament, where emphasis is placed on inner faith rather than external rituals. This can be seen as a tension between physical signs of faith in the Old Testament and the spiritual focus in the New Testament.
Paradox #3
Genesis 17:14 talks about the importance of circumcision as part of a covenant. A contradiction could be that there were other ancient cultures and religious traditions that did not practice circumcision, or saw it differently. This variety in cultural practices could create tension or inconsistency when viewing this verse as a universal requirement.
Paradox #4
The contradiction lies in the practice of circumcision being mandated as a covenant. Scientifically, while circumcision can have some health benefits, it is not universally necessary for well-being. Some people view it as an ethical issue, raising questions about consent and bodily autonomy, especially for infants.
Paradox #5
The moral conflict in Genesis 17:14 could be seen as the tension between religious laws and personal freedom. This verse suggests severe consequences for not following a specific religious ritual, which might seem harsh or unjust to those who value individual rights and personal choice. It raises questions about the balance between obeying religious commands and respecting personal autonomy.