Contradiction with Romans 2:29
This verse emphasizes inward, spiritual circumcision of the heart rather than the outward physical circumcision commanded in Genesis 17:9.
Romans 2:29: But he [is] a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision [is that] of the heart, in the spirit, [and] not in the letter; whose praise [is] not of men, but of God.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:6
Here, Paul states that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value, contradicting the mandate for physical circumcision in Genesis 17:9.
Galatians 5:6: For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:18-19
Paul advises believers to remain as they are regarding circumcision, implying it is not necessary, contrasting with the command in Genesis 17:9.
1 Corinthians 7:18-19: Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
Contradiction with Acts 15:1-2
Early church leaders dispute the necessity of circumcision for salvation, conflicting with the covenantal requirement outlined in Genesis 17:9.
Acts 15:1-2: And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
Contradiction with Philippians 3:3
This verse states that true believers are those who worship in the Spirit and put no confidence in the flesh, opposing the physical requirement of circumcision in Genesis 17:9.
Philippians 3:3: For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise from the requirement placed upon Abraham and his descendants, which could be viewed as a command that imposes religious rituals or practices on individuals without their consent. This could be seen as conflicting with contemporary values of personal choice and bodily autonomy.