Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:3
It contradicts the sparing of Lot's family by commanding the complete destruction of the Amalekites, including women and children.
1 Samuel 15:3: Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
Contradiction with Luke 9:5
It contradicts taking decisive action, suggesting to leave those who do not welcome you rather than hesitating as Lot did.
Luke 9:5: And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.
Contradiction with James 1:8
It describes a double-minded man as unstable, in contrast to Lot's hesitation despite the urgency.
James 1:8: A double minded man [is] unstable in all his ways.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or inconsistency could arise from the idea of divine intervention and human free will. In the verse, Lot is hesitant to leave, but he is saved by being physically moved. This might seem at odds with the concept that humans have the free will to make their own decisions without direct divine interference. However, within the narrative, this action is depicted as an act of divine mercy rather than a contradiction of free will, as it serves to protect Lot and his family from imminent danger.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the idea that Lot hesitated to leave a city destined for destruction despite receiving guidance. This might seem inconsistent with the notion of immediate obedience to divine will. It raises questions about human reluctance or indecision when faced with clear moral or divine directives.