Contradiction with Leviticus 18:6
This verse forbids uncovering the nakedness of a near kin, promoting sexual morals contrary to the actions described in Genesis 19:34.
Leviticus 18:6: None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover [their] nakedness: I [am] the LORD. [near...: Heb. remainder of his flesh]
Contradiction with Leviticus 20:17
This verse condemns sexual relations with a sibling, which contrasts with the events in Genesis 19:34.
Leviticus 20:17: And if a man shall take his sister, his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his nakedness; it [is] a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people: he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:18
This verse advises fleeing sexual immorality, which contradicts the actions depicted in Genesis 19:34.
1 Corinthians 6:18: Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:4
This verse emphasizes the honor of marriage and the judgment of fornicators, opposing the actions in Genesis 19:34.
Hebrews 13:4: Marriage [is] honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.
Paradox #1
The theological conflict in Genesis 19:34 may arise from the moral issues it presents. The situation described can create discomfort or confusion about the moral standards it portrays, as it involves actions that might conflict with broader biblical teachings on morality and behavior. This might lead some readers to question how such actions align with biblical ethics and divine will.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Genesis 19:34 could be seen in the act of manipulation and deception within a family, raising questions about morality and ethical behavior. The incident challenges traditional values of familial respect and integrity.