Contradiction with Leviticus 18:6
This verse prohibits sexual relations between close relatives, which contradicts Genesis 19:36 where Lot's daughters become pregnant by their father.
Leviticus 18:6: None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover [their] nakedness: I [am] the LORD. [near...: Heb. remainder of his flesh]
Contradiction with 2 Peter 2:7-8
Describes Lot as a righteous man, which contradicts the actions in Genesis 19:36 where his daughters bear children by him.
2 Peter 2:7-8: And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
Contradiction with Leviticus 18:7
Prohibits uncovering the nakedness of one's father, contradicting the events of Genesis 19:36 involving Lot and his daughters.
Leviticus 18:7: The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she [is] thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:18
Advises believers to flee from sexual immorality, which is in contrast to the actions described in Genesis 19:36.
1 Corinthians 6:18: Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 27:20
Curses anyone who lies with his father's wife, indicating prohibition against incestuous relationships seen in Genesis 19:36.
Deuteronomy 27:20: Cursed [be] he that lieth with his father's wife; because he uncovereth his father's skirt. And all the people shall say, Amen.
Paradox #1
The verse describes an event that might be viewed as morally questionable or troubling from a modern perspective. This could lead to discussions on ethical norms, cultural context, and interpretations of human behavior in biblical stories. Some might see this as conflicting with other biblical teachings on morality and behavior. However, it is important to understand the historical and narrative context of such stories within the Bible.
Paradox #2
Genesis 19:36 might be seen as controversial or conflicting to some due to its depiction of events considered immoral or inappropriate by modern standards, specifically regarding family relationships and the actions that lead to the events described. This can conflict with contemporary societal values and ethical norms.
Paradox #3
The contradiction of Genesis 19:36 lies in its account of pregnancy resulting from incest, which could lead to genetic concerns such as increased risks of genetic disorders. Inbreeding can cause a higher probability of harmful genetic traits manifesting, which is a concept understood through the study of genetics.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Genesis 19:36 lies in the incestuous relationship it describes. This act conflicts with later biblical teachings and laws that consider incest morally wrong. It raises questions about moral standards and ethical consistency within the biblical narrative.