Contradictions and Paradoxes in Genesis 1:29

Genesis 1:29 might seem to contradict later biblical allowances for eating meat, such as in Genesis 9:3, where God permits Noah and his descendants to consume animals. This could create an inconsistency between initial dietary instructions that appear to advocate for a plant-based diet and the later acceptance of eating meat.

Genesis 1:29 might seem to contradict the idea that all foods were not meant for consumption, as it suggests that plants are provided for food. Some people might see a conflict with later dietary laws or practices that restrict certain foods. However, interpretations vary, and many see these as evolving guidelines rather than strict contradictions.

Genesis 1:29 describes God's provision of plants and fruits for food. A potential contradiction arises when considering other parts of the Bible where God permits the eating of meat (e.g., Genesis 9:3), leading to questions about dietary instructions. Hence, there's an inconsistency in dietary guidelines between different passages.

Some people might see a contradiction because the verse suggests that all plants are meant to be food for humans. However, many plants are toxic or inedible to humans, which conflicts with the idea that every plant is intended to be eaten.

The contradiction or conflict could arise from the interpretation that humans have the right to use all plants freely, which might clash with views on environmental conservation and the overexploitation of natural resources. Some might see a conflict between using resources and the responsibility to protect the environment.