Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Contradicts the command to sacrifice Isaac by stating "Thou shalt not kill."
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with James 1:13
States that God does not tempt anyone, contradicting the test of faith presented in Genesis 22:16.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 19:5
Condemns the act of child sacrifice, unlike the command to sacrifice Isaac.
Jeremiah 19:5: They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire [for] burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake [it], neither came [it] into my mind:
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
Emphasizes sacrifice as ineffective for forgiveness, contradicting the perceived necessity of Isaac's sacrifice.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
Highlights God's desire for mercy, not sacrifice, which contrasts with the directive to sacrifice Isaac.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 18:10
Forbids child sacrifices, opposing God's command to Abraham.
Deuteronomy 18:10: There shall not be found among you [any one] that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, [or] that useth divination, [or] an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
Contradiction with Micah 6:7-8
Challenges the need for a human sacrifice, unlike the command in Genesis.
Micah 6:7-8: Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, [or] with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn [for] my transgression, the fruit of my body [for] the sin of my soul? [body: Heb. belly]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction lies in the concept of God swearing by Himself, which might seem conflicting with the idea that God is unchangeable and all-knowing. If God is perfect and always keeps His promises, some might wonder why there is a need for Him to make an oath. This could seem inconsistent with the nature of a perfect and sovereign deity who does not need to reinforce His promises in a human-like manner. However, in theological understanding, this action could be seen as a way to emphasize the certainty of His promise to humans.
Paradox #2
Genesis 22:16 might raise moral questions about the idea of being asked to sacrifice a loved one. It can be seen as conflicting with moral beliefs that prioritize the protection and love of family members. Some might find it inconsistent with the notion of a loving and just deity asking for such a difficult test of faith.