Contradiction with James 2:1
This verse emphasizes showing no favoritism, which contradicts Isaac's preference for Esau over Jacob.
James 2:1: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
Contradiction with Romans 2:11
This verse declares that God shows no partiality, conflicting with Isaac's favoritism based on personal taste.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse promotes equality in Christ, contrasting with the division caused by Isaac's preferential treatment of Esau.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34
This verse teaches that God does not show favoritism, opposing Isaac's partiality toward Esau.
Acts 10:34: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Colossians 3:25
This verse indicates that wrong favoritism will be judged without partiality, contradicting Isaac's biased love for Esau.
Colossians 3:25: But he that doeth wrong shall receive for the wrong which he hath done: and there is no respect of persons.
Contradiction with Proverbs 28:21
This verse warns against showing favoritism, which aligns with Isaac's actions towards Esau and Jacob.
Proverbs 28:21: To have respect of persons [is] not good: for for a piece of bread [that] man will transgress.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 10:17
This verse describes God as impartial, clashing with Isaac's preferential behavior towards Esau.
Deuteronomy 10:17: For the LORD your God [is] God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:15
This verse instructs not to show partiality in judgment, which is contradicted by Isaac's favoritism based on superficial reasons.
Leviticus 19:15: Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 1:17
This verse highlights impartial judgment from God, differing from Isaac's preference for Esau.
1 Peter 1:17: And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning [here] in fear:
Contradiction with Luke 20:21
This verse highlights Jesus teaching without favoritism, contrasting Isaac's personal bias.
Luke 20:21: And they asked him, saying, Master, we know that thou sayest and teachest rightly, neither acceptest thou the person [of any], but teachest the way of God truly: [truly: or, of a truth]
Paradox #1
Genesis 25:28 highlights parental favoritism, as it notes that Isaac loved Esau while Rebekah loved Jacob. This could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency with the Biblical ideal of equitable love and fairness in family relationships. The favoritism displayed here leads to conflict and deceit within the family, which seems at odds with the themes of unity and love taught elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
Genesis 25:28 mentions a situation where a parent shows favoritism towards one of their children. The potential doctrinal conflict here is with the biblical principle of impartiality and fairness, as seen in other scriptures that promote love and equal treatment towards all family members. This could be seen as inconsistent with teachings on fairness and equality within a family.
Paradox #3
Genesis 25:28 mentions parental favoritism, where Isaac loves Esau and Rebekah loves Jacob. The contradiction here could be in the family dynamics and values demonstrated elsewhere in the Bible, where fairness and equal love are often highlighted. This favoritism leads to conflict and deception, which seems inconsistent with the teachings that promote family harmony and integrity.
Paradox #4
Genesis 25:28 might present a moral inconsistency related to parental favoritism. The verse describes how each parent favored a different child, which could lead to family conflict and feelings of unfairness or inequality. Favoritism can create division and conflict within a family, which contrasts with the values of fairness and love.