Contradiction with Hebrews 12:16
This verse warns against being like Esau, who for a single meal sold his birthright, highlighting it as an act of profane disregard.
Hebrews 12:16: Lest there [be] any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.
Contradiction with Genesis 27:36
In this verse, Esau laments being supplanted by Jacob twice, emphasizing the profound regret and sense of unfairness regarding the loss of his birthright.
Genesis 27:36: And he said, Is not he rightly named Jacob? for he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright; and, behold, now he hath taken away my blessing. And he said, Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? [Jacob: that is, A supplanter]
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:25
This verse cautions against making rash vows or actions, similar to Esau's impulsive decision to sell his birthright.
Proverbs 20:25: [It is] a snare to the man [who] devoureth [that which is] holy, and after vows to make enquiry.
Contradiction with Matthew 16:26
This verse questions the profit of gaining the world at the cost of one's soul, paralleling the idea of losing something invaluable for a temporary gain.
Matthew 16:26: For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:16
This verse notes that every prudent man acts with knowledge, contrasting with Esau's shortsighted decision to sell his birthright.
Proverbs 13:16: Every prudent [man] dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open [his] folly. [layeth...: Heb. spreadeth]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in this situation is about valuing immediate satisfaction over long-term benefits. One character gives up their important birthright for something as temporary as a meal, showing a conflict between short-term desires and long-term responsibilities or rewards. This could reflect the tension between acting on impulse and considering future consequences.