Contradiction with Genesis 27:19
Jacob claims to be Esau, contradicting the principle of honesty in Genesis 27:36, where Esau laments being deceived.
Genesis 27:19: And Jacob said unto his father, I [am] Esau thy firstborn; I have done according as thou badest me: arise, I pray thee, sit and eat of my venison, that thy soul may bless me.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:15
The commandment "Thou shalt not steal" contradicts Jacob's act of stealing Esau's blessing.
Exodus 20:15: Thou shalt not steal.
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:22
This verse states that lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, contradicting Jacob's deception.
Proverbs 12:22: Lying lips [are] abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly [are] his delight.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
The Golden Rule contradicts Jacob's actions toward Esau, which were deceitful and self-serving.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:25
Advises to "speak every man truth with his neighbour", contradicting Jacob's deceptive behavior.
Ephesians 4:25: Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction in Genesis 27:36 involves Jacob's deceit. Jacob, whose name is linked to "deceiver," obtains his father Isaac's blessing meant for Esau. This raises questions about morality and divine justice because deceptive actions lead to a favorable outcome for Jacob, which seems inconsistent with the Bible's teachings against lying and deceit.
Paradox #2
Genesis 27:36 could be seen as conflicting with earlier promises and cultural practices. In this context, Esau expresses frustration about losing his birthright to Jacob, which was traditionally given to the firstborn. This situation contrasts with the earlier sale of the birthright, where Esau willingly gave it up for a meal. The contradiction lies in the tension between cultural expectations of the firstborn and the unfolding of events that led Jacob to receive the blessing usually reserved for Esau. This may raise questions about fairness and the validity of such transactions.
Paradox #3
The historical conflict in Genesis 27:36 could be related to the themes of deceit and inheritance rights. It shows the tension between Esau and Jacob, where Esau feels cheated out of his birthright and blessing. This story may raise questions about family dynamics and moral lessons, as it highlights the consequences of favoritism and deception. It also reflects cultural norms of ancient inheritance practices, which might seem unfair or inconsistent by modern standards.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in that verse could be about deception. It involves a situation where one brother deceives another to gain a blessing that wasn't meant for him. This raises questions about fairness, trust, and whether the ends justify the means.