Contradiction with Exodus 34:7
While Genesis 29:33 suggests that God acknowledges Leah's unloved state by giving her a son, Exodus 34:7 speaks of God visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, which can imply a more punitive stance rather than compassionate acknowledgment.
Exodus 34:7: Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation].
Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
In Genesis 29:33, God appears to change Leah's situation by blessing her with a son, whereas Numbers 23:19 states that God does not change His mind like humans do.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 10:17
Genesis 29:33 portrays a personal God who shows favoritism to Leah by granting her a son, while Deuteronomy 10:17 emphasizes that God is not partial and does not take bribes.
Deuteronomy 10:17: For the LORD your God [is] God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward:
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8
Genesis 29:33 suggests a reason for God's actions based on human understanding (Leah's unloved state), whereas Isaiah 55:8 declares that God's thoughts and ways are beyond human comprehension.
Isaiah 55:8: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Romans 2:11
Genesis 29:33 shows God as being partial to Leah's situation, yet Romans 2:11 states that there is no respect of persons with God, suggesting impartiality.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.