Contradiction with Philippians 2:3
Contradicts by promoting selflessness, whereas Genesis 30:15 depicts personal rivalry and bargaining.
Philippians 2:3: [Let] nothing [be done] through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.
Contradiction with James 3:16
Contradicts by associating envy and strife with confusion and evil deeds, unlike the accepted jealousy in Genesis 30:15.
James 3:16: For where envying and strife [is], there [is] confusion and every evil work. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Contradicts by instructing love for enemies, contrasting with the contention between Leah and Rachel in Genesis 30:15.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:4
Contradicts by defining love as not being envious, unlike the jealousy displayed in Genesis 30:15.
1 Corinthians 13:4: Charity suffereth long, [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, [vaunteth...: or, is not rash]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:26
Contradicts by advising against becoming conceited, provoking, or envying one another, contrary to the behavior shown in Genesis 30:15.
Galatians 5:26: Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another.
Paradox #1
The potential theological conflict in Genesis 30:15 arises from the themes of family dynamics and ethical behavior. The verse depicts an arrangement between Leah and Rachel involving personal relationships and desire, which may raise questions about the ethical implications of using personal relationships for bargaining. Additionally, this scenario might be seen as conflicting with ideals of love and fidelity in marriage.
Paradox #2
Genesis 30:15 involves Leah and Rachel negotiating over mandrakes and marital arrangements, but any perceived contradiction or inconsistency is more about differing interpretations or cultural understandings, especially regarding marital customs at the time. It's about social dynamics and family relationships rather than a contradiction. Hence, the conflicts are mainly interpretative rather than historical.
Paradox #3
This verse brings up issues around fairness and jealousy in relationships. It shows a conflict between two sisters who are both married to the same man and competing for his attention and affection. This raises questions about the morality of polygamy and the emotional harm it can cause.