Contradictions and Paradoxes in Genesis 31:42

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Genesis 31:42 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Genesis 31:42. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, who is thought to have written Genesis, Jacob is saying that if God hadn't been with him, his uncle Laban would have sent him away with nothing. Jacob believes that God saw how hard he worked and protected him by telling Laban not to harm him.

Genesis 31:42: Except the God of my father, the God of Abraham, and the fear of Isaac, had been with me, surely thou hadst sent me away now empty. God hath seen mine affliction and the labour of my hands, and rebuked [thee] yesternight.

Contradiction with Philippians 4:19

This verse speaks of God providing all needs, yet Genesis 31:42 mentions God's protection of Jacob’s possessions, suggesting reliance on divine fairness rather than assurance of provision.

Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.

Contradiction with Psalm 37:25

This verse states that the righteous are never forsaken, differing from Genesis 31:42 where Jacob feels he would have faced suffering without God's intervention.

Psalm 37:25: I have been young, and [now] am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:10

This verse encourages generosity because God will bless the work of your hands, contrasting with Jacob’s reliance on God to prevent Laban's deceit regarding his wages.

Deuteronomy 15:10: Thou shalt surely give him, and thine heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him: because that for this thing the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto.

Contradiction with Job 5:17

This verse blesses those whom God corrects, whereas in Genesis 31:42, God’s role is as a protector from wrongdoing rather than a corrector.

Job 5:17: Behold, happy [is] the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not thou the chastening of the Almighty:

Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-32

These verses advise not to worry about material needs since God provides, whereas Jacob expresses concern for his welfare without God's help.

Matthew 6:31-32: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?

Paradox #1

The contradiction or inconsistency in this verse could be seen in the context of fairness and divine intervention. The verse suggests that a person's success or protection primarily depends on divine favor. This could conflict with ideas of fairness and human effort, where it is believed that hard work and fairness should determine the outcome rather than divine intervention or favoritism. This might raise questions about the role of human agency and merit.

← Genesis 31:41
Share
Genesis 31:43 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.