Contradiction with Genesis 32:28
This verse contradicts Genesis 32:25 by stating that Jacob's name was changed to Israel because he has power with God and with men, suggesting a victory, while Genesis 32:25 implies a struggle with his thigh being out of joint.
Genesis 32:28: And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed. [Israel: that is, A prince of God]
Contradiction with Exodus 15:3
This verse describes the Lord as a man of war, suggesting an overwhelming power as opposed to a mere struggle presented in Genesis 32:25.
Exodus 15:3: The LORD [is] a man of war: the LORD [is] his name.
Contradiction with Isaiah 40:29
This verse highlights God's ability to give power to the weak, which contrasts with the image of Jacob's physical weakness in Genesis 32:25.
Isaiah 40:29: He giveth power to the faint; and to [them that have] no might he increaseth strength.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 12:9
This verse speaks of strength being made perfect in weakness, offering a different perspective to the physical struggle and injury mentioned in Genesis 32:25.
2 Corinthians 12:9: And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
Paradox #1
This verse might raise questions about the nature and power of God. Some people might wonder how a human could physically struggle with a divine being, suggesting a potential contradiction if God is all-powerful. This could lead to debates about the portrayal of God's attributes in different contexts within scripture.
Paradox #2
Genesis 32:25 describes a physical struggle between Jacob and a mysterious figure, often interpreted as an angel or God. The contradiction could arise from the idea that a human can physically struggle with a divine being. This may conflict with the belief in God's supreme power and the idea that humans are inherently weaker than the divine. It raises questions about the nature of God's interaction with people and why such a struggle would be necessary or allowed.