Contradiction with Matthew 20:16
Genesis 33:2 shows favoritism by prioritizing Rachel and Joseph last, contradicting Matthew's teaching on the last being first and the first last.
Matthew 20:16: So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Genesis 33:2 reflects hierarchical favoritism, conflicting with Galatians' message of equality in Christ.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with James 2:9
Genesis 33:2 displays partiality among Jacob's family, contrary to the exhortation against favoritism in James.
James 2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34
Genesis 33:2 suggests favoritism, whereas Acts emphasizes God’s impartiality.
Acts 10:34: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:23
Genesis 33:2 involves favoritism, in contrast to the principle in Proverbs against showing partiality.
Proverbs 24:23: These [things] also [belong] to the wise. [It is] not good to have respect of persons in judgment.
Paradox #1
Genesis 33:2 might be seen as showing favoritism, as one family member arranges others in a way that seems to prioritize their protection differently. Such an act can raise questions about equality and fairness in how loved ones are treated.