Contradiction with Isaiah 61:10
This verse describes God clothing people with garments of salvation and righteousness, emphasizing spiritual attributes rather than physical clothing.
Isaiah 61:10: I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath clothed me with the garments of salvation, he hath covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh [himself] with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth [herself] with her jewels. [decketh: Heb. decketh as a priest]
Contradiction with Matthew 6:25
Jesus advises not to worry about clothing, suggesting that what God provides is not about physical garments but focuses on more significant spiritual needs.
Matthew 6:25: Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
Contradiction with Luke 12:22-23
Similar to Matthew 6:25, it emphasizes that life is more than food and clothing, indicating that God's care isn't necessarily about physical provision like in Genesis 3:21.
Luke 12:22-23: And he said unto his disciples, Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:3-4
This scripture teaches that adornment should not be merely external, showing a preference for inner qualities over physical clothing.
1 Peter 3:3-4: Whose adorning let it not be that outward [adorning] of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 5:2-3
Paul speaks about longing to be clothed with our heavenly dwelling, contrasting spiritual covering with the physical clothing provided in Genesis 3:21.
2 Corinthians 5:2-3: For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven:
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction with Genesis 3:21 involves the act of God making garments of skin for Adam and Eve. This suggests God performed the first animal sacrifice. Some might find this inconsistent with a view of God as unchanging, as later in the Bible, the sacrificial system is not initiated until much later. It could create a tension for those who see God as establishing certain practices only at specific times in biblical history.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict is regarding the origin of clothing. Genesis 3:21 suggests that God made garments for Adam and Eve, whereas in some cultures and historical contexts, clothing design and creations are viewed as human inventions or developments over time. This poses a question about divine intervention versus human innovation in the development of clothing.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in Genesis 3:21 is the idea of God providing clothing made from animal skins for Adam and Eve. This act may seem inconsistent with the idea of a benevolent creator, as it implies the death of animals to cover human mistakes, raising questions about the value of animal life in this context.