Contradiction with 1 Kings 8:27
Genesis 3:8 suggests God is physically present, but 1 Kings 8:27 states that God cannot be contained by earth or heaven, implying His omnipresence rather than a physical presence.
1 Kings 8:27: But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded?
Contradiction with John 4:24
Genesis 3:8 depicts God as walking in the garden, while John 4:24 states that God is spirit.
John 4:24: God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.
Contradiction with Psalm 139:7-8
Genesis 3:8 implies God's presence was localized, while Psalm 139:7-8 emphasizes God's omnipresence, suggesting He is everywhere at all times.
Psalm 139:7-8: Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
Contradiction with Hebrews 4:13
Genesis 3:8 implies that God was not aware of Adam and Eve's actions until later; Hebrews 4:13 contradicts this by stating that everything is uncovered and laid bare before God.
Hebrews 4:13: Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things [are] naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.
Contradiction with Isaiah 40:28
Genesis 3:8 can be read as God being unaware initially of Adam and Eve hiding due to their sin, but Isaiah 40:28 states that God does not grow tired or weary, and His understanding is unsearchable, indicating He would know already.
Isaiah 40:28: Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, [that] the everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? [there is] no searching of his understanding.
Paradox #1
The scientific inconsistency in this context could be related to the idea of God physically walking in the Garden of Eden, which implies a physical form and presence that science does not support within our understanding of deities or metaphysical entities. Additionally, the concept of a garden with specific divine interactions does not align with current scientific understanding of the natural world and human origins.