Contradiction with Genesis 50:20
This verse suggests that God intended good from the beginning, while Genesis 42:20 implies a condition based on human actions.
Genesis 50:20: But as for you, ye thought evil against me; [but] God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as [it is] this day, to save much people alive.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Advocates for love and forgiveness towards enemies, contrasting with the conditional demand for truth and honesty through fear in Genesis 42:20.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 6:36
Encourages mercy, which seems contrary to the conditional test or threat presented in Genesis 42:20.
Luke 6:36: Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Advises against repaying evil for evil, contrasting with the retaliatory tone seen in Genesis 42:20.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:5
Describes love as not keeping record of wrongs, opposing the accusatory stance seen in the directive of Genesis 42:20.
1 Corinthians 13:5: Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
Paradox #1
In Genesis 42:20, there might be a perceived moral inconsistency in the way Joseph tests his brothers by demanding they bring their youngest brother back to Egypt to prove they are not spies. Some might see this as Joseph acting deceitfully or harshly towards his brothers, despite knowing their past actions and his own forgiveness. This raises questions about the morality of using deception or manipulation to achieve a just outcome.