Contradiction with Genesis 37:33
Jacob believes a wild beast has devoured Joseph, yet Joseph is alive, contradicting Jacob's belief about harm coming to his sons.
Genesis 37:33: And he knew it, and said, [It is] my son's coat; an evil beast hath devoured him; Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces.
Contradiction with Genesis 45:26
Jacob initially refuses to believe Joseph is alive, doubting the preservation of life stated in Genesis 42:38.
Genesis 45:26: And told him, saying, Joseph [is] yet alive, and he [is] governor over all the land of Egypt. And Jacob's heart fainted, for he believed them not. [Jacob's: Heb. his]
Contradiction with Psalm 91:10
This verse expresses protection from harm, contradicting Jacob's fear of mischief befalling his son.
Psalm 91:10: There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.
Contradiction with Romans 8:28
The verse suggests that all things work for good, contradicting Jacob's fear that sending Benjamin will lead to loss.
Romans 8:28: And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
This verse speaks of plans for welfare and not for evil, contradicting Jacob's belief that harm will come to Benjamin.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Genesis 42:38 could be related to the theme of favoritism and its consequences. Jacob refuses to send his youngest son, Benjamin, to Egypt due to fear of losing him, just as he lost Joseph. This favoritism may appear inconsistent with the idea of fairness and equal treatment of children, which can lead to family conflict and jealousy among siblings.