Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
This verse promotes the law of retaliation ("eye for eye"), while Genesis 44:33 emphasizes self-sacrifice for another.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises not to resist evil and to turn the other cheek, contradicting the self-sacrificial offer in Genesis 44:33.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 16:25
This verse promotes losing one's life to find it, whereas Genesis 44:33 involves offering to take another's place.
Matthew 16:25: For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.
Paradox #1
Genesis 44:33 presents a situation where one character offers to take the place of another to protect their family. The moral conflict here could be the challenge of sacrificing oneself for the good of others, raising questions about personal responsibility versus familial obligation. The contradiction might lie in the tension between individual freedom and collective duty.