Contradiction with Genesis 50:20
This verse emphasizes human intent for evil, which could contradict Joseph's claim in Genesis 45:8 that his journey was directed by God for good.
Genesis 50:20: But as for you, ye thought evil against me; [but] God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as [it is] this day, to save much people alive.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
This verse highlights God's specific plans for individuals, which might contradict the notion that Joseph's brothers had a different purpose in sending him to Egypt.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with Job 1:21
This verse acknowledges that God gives and takes away, suggesting a direct involvement that may contradict Joseph's statement that his brothers did not send him to Egypt.
Job 1:21: And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
This verse implies that human plans exist but it is the Lord's purpose that prevails, which could contrast Joseph's statement of God sending him.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Contradiction with Isaiah 45:7
This verse suggests God creates both prosperity and disaster, which might contradict Joseph's claim of God sending him for a specific good purpose.
Isaiah 45:7: I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these [things].
Contradiction with Lamentations 3:38
This verse indicates that both good and bad events come from God, which can challenge Joseph's view separating his brothers' actions from God's purpose.
Lamentations 3:38: Out of the mouth of the most High proceedeth not evil and good?
Paradox #1
Genesis 45:8 might present a theological conflict by suggesting that God orchestrated events that caused hardship or suffering to ultimately bring about a good outcome. Some might question how a loving and just God can be responsible for negative experiences or bad actions by individuals. This raises debates about free will, divine providence, and the nature of God's involvement in human affairs.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction in how Joseph says God made him a ruler in Egypt, yet earlier in the story, his brothers sold him into slavery. The question arises: was it God's plan from the beginning, or did God turn a bad situation into something good? This can make it seem inconsistent when trying to understand God's role in Joseph's journey.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Genesis 45:8 could be that it raises questions about human free will versus divine intervention. If God is seen as controlling events so directly, it might conflict with the idea that people have the freedom to make their own choices, especially if some choices lead to harm or hardship for others. This tension between divine planning and personal responsibility can be seen as a conflict in understanding how both coexist.