Contradiction with Matthew 6:26
This verse emphasizes God's provision and care without the need for trading possessions, whereas Genesis 47:17 involves trading livestock to survive.
Matthew 6:26: Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Contradiction with Luke 12:24
It presents a message of relying on God’s provision rather than exchanging goods for necessities, contrasting with the transactional nature of Genesis 47:17.
Luke 12:24: Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the fowls?
Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This asserts that God will supply all needs according to His riches, opposing the idea of giving up what you own for sustenance seen in Genesis 47:17.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
Genesis 47:17 might raise moral questions about fairness and exploitation. Some people could see the actions in this verse as an imbalance of power, where one party gains significantly more at the expense of another in a time of need. This could be seen as morally questionable depending on how these actions align with ideas of justice and compassion.