Contradictions and Paradoxes in Genesis 47:24

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Genesis 47:24 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Genesis 47:24. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, this verse means that the people were to give a small part of what they grew to the king, Pharaoh, while keeping most of it for themselves and their families. This was so they could have enough to plant again, have food to eat, and take care of their children.

Genesis 47:24: And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth [part] unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones.

Contradiction with Exodus 1:11

Features measures against the Israelites through forced labor rather than taxation of produce, differing in method but not directly contradicting the context of Genesis 47:24.

Exodus 1:11: Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

Contradiction with Exodus 5:6-7

Discusses the withholding of straw from the Israelites, which is a form of increased labor, contrasting with the tax system of Genesis 47:24 by being a direct increase in their burden rather than a systematic tax.

Exodus 5:6-7: And Pharaoh commanded the same day the taskmasters of the people, and their officers, saying,

Contradiction with Isaiah 10:1-2

Speaks against unjust laws and oppressive decrees, which could morally contrast a taxation system as seen in Genesis 47:24 but specifically addresses a broader issue of oppression.

Isaiah 10:1-2: Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness [which] they have prescribed; [that write...: or, to the writers that write grievousness]

Paradox #1

This verse involves a situation where people are taxed a portion of their produce. The contradiction could be seen in the context of fairness and exploitation. Some might view the requirement to give a part of their harvest as taking advantage of people's hard work, especially in times of need. Others might see it as a necessary governance duty. The conflict lies in balancing community welfare with individual autonomy and fairness.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information provided.