Contradiction with Proverbs 16:4
This verse suggests that the LORD has made everything for a purpose, including the wicked for the day of evil, which could contradict the notion of evil events being repurposed for good.
Proverbs 16:4: The LORD hath made all [things] for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
Contradiction with Isaiah 45:7
This verse claims that God creates both peace and evil, which might imply that evil is a direct creation and not necessarily meant for good.
Isaiah 45:7: I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these [things].
Contradiction with Amos 3:6
This suggests that evil in a city is brought about by the LORD, implying intentionality rather than a transformation of evil for good.
Amos 3:6: Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done [it]? [be afraid: or, run together?] [the LORD...: or, shall not the LORD do somewhat?]
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 8:14
This observes that there are righteous people who receive what the wicked deserve, and vice versa, pointing to seeming injustice instead of a reinterpretation for good.
Ecclesiastes 8:14: There is a vanity which is done upon the earth; that there be just [men], unto whom it happeneth according to the work of the wicked; again, there be wicked [men], to whom it happeneth according to the work of the righteous: I said that this also [is] vanity.
Contradiction with Job 21:7-13
This passage describes the prosperity of the wicked, which contrasts with the idea of evil plans being turned to good.
Job 21:7-13: Wherefore do the wicked live, become old, yea, are mighty in power?
Contradiction with Habakkuk 1:13
This verse questions why God tolerates treachery and remains silent while the wicked swallow those more righteous, challenging the view that evil is inherently transformed to good.
Habakkuk 1:13: [Thou art] of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity: wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, [and] holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth [the man that is] more righteous than he? [iniquity: or, grievance]
Paradox #1
The perceived contradiction in Genesis 50:20 might arise from the idea of reconciling human free will with divine providence. Some people might wonder how God can use people's harmful actions for good purposes without overriding their free will. This tension between God's sovereignty and human responsibility can be a point of debate among theologians.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction could be with the idea that all suffering is only negative or meaningless. Genesis 50:20 suggests that something intended for harm can be used for good by God, which might conflict with views that do not allow for a positive outcome from negative events.
Paradox #3
The verse is often seen as showing a contradiction between human intentions and divine plans. While people may have bad intentions, this verse suggests that God's plan can turn those intentions into something good. This can be inconsistent with the belief in free will, as it raises questions about how human actions can be both freely made and part of a predestined plan.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this context could be the idea that harm or evil actions can be used for a good outcome. While the verse suggests that negative intentions can lead to positive results, it raises questions about whether the initial wrongdoing can be justified if it ultimately leads to something good. This can create confusion about the morality of actions and their consequences.