Contradictions and Paradoxes in Genesis 5:25

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Genesis 5:25 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Genesis 5:25. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, who is said to have written the book of Genesis, this verse tells us that a man named Methuselah lived a very long time, and when he was 187 years old, he had a son named Lamech. Christians understand this to show that people lived much longer a long time ago.

Genesis 5:25: And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech:

Contradiction with Genesis 6:3

This verse states that man's days shall be 120 years, contradicting the long lifespans like Methuselah's 969 years in Genesis 5:25.

Genesis 6:3: And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also [is] flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

Contradiction with Psalm 90:10

Describes an average human lifespan as 70 to 80 years, contrasting Methuselah’s much longer lifespan in Genesis 5:25.

Psalm 90:10: The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away. [The days...: Heb. As for the days of our years, in them are seventy years]

Paradox #1

The Bible does not provide much scientific information in Genesis 5:25, so any perceived contradiction or inconsistency would likely relate to broader themes in Genesis, such as the long lifespans of early humans. From a scientific point of view, people do not live for hundreds of years, as suggested in some of these genealogical accounts, due to biological limits on human aging and lifespan. This can be seen as contradictory with our current understanding of human biology and history.

Paradox #2

The possible contradiction in Genesis 5:25 involves Methuselah's age and the timeline of the flood. According to the ages given in Genesis 5, Methuselah would have died in the same year as the flood if you add up the years carefully. This could be seen as a timeline inconsistency, as it's debated whether he died just before the flood or was somehow saved from it.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.