Contradiction with Job 25:4-6
These verses describe humans as nothing pure or great compared to God, contrasting with Genesis 6:4 where "mighty men" and "men of renown" seem highly esteemed.
Job 25:4-6: How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean [that is] born of a woman?
Contradiction with Psalm 8:4-5
These verses speak of humans being a little lower than the angels, whereas Genesis 6:4 presents a situation where human and divine beings mix, suggesting a temporary elevation.
Psalm 8:4-5: What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
Contradiction with Matthew 22:30
This verse implies that angels do not marry, yet Genesis 6:4 suggests "sons of God" (interpreted by some as angels) interacting with human women.
Matthew 22:30: But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:39-40
This passage states that there are different kinds of flesh for humans and celestial beings, contrasting with the apparent integration presented in Genesis 6:4.
1 Corinthians 15:39-40: All flesh [is] not the same flesh: but [there is] one [kind of] flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, [and] another of birds.
Paradox #1
Genesis 6:4 mentions "Nephilim" and the "sons of God" having children with human women, which can conflict with other biblical teachings about the nature and role of divine beings and humans. This raises questions about the identity of the "sons of God" and how such interactions fit into the overall biblical narrative about creation and spiritual beings. Some interpret this as a theological inconsistency because it introduces elements that challenge typical understandings of the separation between divine and human realms.
Paradox #2
Some people see a conflict between Genesis 6:4 and other parts of the Bible because this verse talks about "Nephilim," which are mysterious beings. Some sections of the Bible emphasize that angels do not marry or have children, raising questions about who the Nephilim are and how they came to be. This has led to different interpretations and confusion about their origin and nature.
Paradox #3
"Genesis 6:4" discusses the Nephilim, mysterious figures said to exist in ancient times. The contradiction comes from the lack of clear evidence about who or what the Nephilim were, leading to various interpretations and debates. Some see them as mythical beings, while others try to connect them to historical people. This lack of clarity and agreement creates inconsistency in understanding their role or identity.
Paradox #4
The main scientific inconsistency with that verse comes from the mention of giants, or "Nephilim," living on Earth. This idea conflicts with our current understanding of human evolution and anthropology, which doesn't have evidence of such beings existing. The concept of superhuman beings doesn't align with what is known from fossil records or human history.
Paradox #5
Genesis 6:4 mentions the Nephilim, mysterious beings on Earth. The contradiction or conflict could be about the nature of these beings and their origins. Some interpretations suggest they were offspring of divine beings and humans, which raises questions about the boundaries between divine and human, and the morality of such unions. This can conflict with the idea of separate realms for divine and human entities.
Paradox #6
The contradiction in Genesis 6:4 might relate to the presence of "Nephilim" and the phrase "there were giants in the earth in those days, and also after that." This could be seen as contradictory because it implies these beings existed both before and after a specific event (the Flood), which raises questions about how they survived if they were indeed wiped out like other creatures in the Flood narrative. However, interpretations vary, and some do not see this as a numerical inconsistency but rather a narrative or interpretative issue.