Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse states "Thou shalt not kill," which may be seen as contradicting Genesis 9:5, where God requires a reckoning for the shedding of human blood.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse instructs to resist not evil and to turn the other cheek, contrasting with the call for a reckoning in Genesis 9:5.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against seeking personal vengeance, instead leaving it to God, which may appear to oppose the direct accountability mentioned in Genesis 9:5.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
Genesis 9:5 could be seen as having a potential contradiction or conflict concerning God's command about shedding human blood and the value of life. In particular, there might be a perceived inconsistency between this verse and other parts of the Bible that highlight forgiveness, mercy, and the value of redemption over retribution. This could create tension between the concepts of justice and mercy.
Paradox #2
Genesis 9:5 could be seen as inconsistent with the theme of forgiveness and non-retaliation emphasized in other parts of the Bible, like the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament about turning the other cheek and forgiving those who have wronged you. This verse implies a divine requirement for justice or accountability for taking a life, which might seem at odds with the later message of mercy and forgiveness.
Paradox #3
Genesis 9:5 could be seen as inconsistent when compared with earlier verses in the Bible that speak about the value of life and the prohibition against killing. For example, in Genesis 4:15, God protects Cain, who killed Abel, by marking him so no one would kill him. This could be viewed as conflicting with the idea in Genesis 9:5 about God demanding justice for taking a life. Such differences may raise questions about changes in divine justice or expectations for human behavior over time.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or inconsistency could relate to the idea of the Earth having a global flood and the repopulation of all life. Scientifically, there is no evidence of a global flood occurring in the way described, and the genetic diversity seen in humans and animals today suggests that life could not have come from a single family or a small group of animals over a short period.
Paradox #5
Genesis 9:5 could be seen as having a moral conflict because, on one hand, it discusses accountability for taking a life, implying a respect for life. On the other hand, it also suggests a divine right to take life as part of justice, which can be seen as contradicting the principle of preserving life. This might create tension between the sanctity of life and the use of capital punishment.