Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Genesis 9:6 promotes retributive justice through taking a life for a life, whereas Matthew 5:44 emphasizes love and forgiveness towards enemies, indicating a non-violent response.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
While Genesis 9:6 suggests a principle of direct retribution, Romans 12:17 advises against repaying evil for evil, promoting a peaceful approach rather than taking justice into one's own hands.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Genesis 9:6 endorses the taking of life as retribution, whereas Exodus 20:13 clearly states, "Thou shalt not kill," which can be seen as a prohibition of taking human life.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Genesis 9:6 suggests a justice system based on retribution, but Matthew 5:39 encourages not resisting an evil person, instead opting for non-retaliation.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with James 4:12
Genesis 9:6 gives authority to humans to take a life for a life whereas James 4:12 states that there is one lawgiver who is able to save and destroy, thus questioning humanity’s role in enacting life-for-life justice.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Genesis 9:6 could be with the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" found in Exodus 20:13. While Genesis 9:6 seems to support capital punishment, the commandment in Exodus suggests a prohibition against taking life. This creates an inconsistency between the promotion of justice through capital punishment and the broader command not to kill.
Paradox #2
Genesis 9:6 could be seen as contradicting the idea of forgiveness and mercy that is emphasized in other parts of the Bible, like in the teachings of Jesus about turning the other cheek and loving your enemies. The verse implies a strict and immediate justice for wrongs, whereas the New Testament often advocates for forgiveness and redemption.
Paradox #3
Genesis 9:6 talks about the idea of justice and human life being sacred. One contradiction or inconsistency might be that while this verse highlights the importance of life and justice, there are also other parts of the Bible that describe wars, punishments, and actions commanded by God that result in loss of life. This can appear inconsistent to some readers who see a conflict between the sanctity of life and the instances where life is taken in various biblical narratives.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction with modern science is the concept of justice and retribution suggested in the verse. Science, particularly fields like criminology and psychology, often examines behavior through the lens of environmental influences, mental health, and social factors, which suggests that actions might be more complex than simply requiring equivalent retribution. Instead of enforcing a strict consequence for actions, modern approaches might focus on rehabilitation and understanding the root causes of behavior.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict might arise when considering the biblical command "Do not kill" against the action of taking a life as a punishment for murder. This could be seen as inconsistent because it involves responding to killing by permitting another killing, which may seem to clash with the broader theme of promoting peace and forgiveness.