Contradiction with Proverbs 21:31
While Habakkuk 1:10 suggests human military prowess is viewed with scorn, Proverbs 21:31 emphasizes that ultimate victory comes from the Lord, not human power.
Proverbs 21:31: The horse [is] prepared against the day of battle: but safety [is] of the LORD. [safety: or, victory]
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Habakkuk 1:10 speaks of people mocking fortresses, contrasting with Isaiah 2:4's vision of peace where nations beat swords into plowshares, indicating an end to military conquest.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Habakkuk 1:10 implies hostility and derision, but Matthew 5:44 teaches to love enemies and pray for those who persecute, opposing the mocking derision Habakkuk describes.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Habakkuk 1:10 suggests mocking opponents without fear of retaliation, whereas Romans 12:17 advises not to repay evil for evil, indicating a peaceful approach over one of contempt.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
In contrast to the disrespect shown in Habakkuk 1:10, Luke 6:29 advises to offer the other cheek if struck, promoting non-retaliation and humility.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Habakkuk 1:10 could be seen in the portrayal of a powerful invading force mocking rulers and fortresses, which might contradict moral values of respect, justice, and peace. The verse highlights the arrogance and destructiveness of the invaders, which can create tension with the ideals of humility and defense of the oppressed.