Contradiction with Leviticus 4:20
This verse describes the ongoing requirement of sin offerings for atonement, implying sacrifices are still needed, unlike Hebrews 10:18 which speaks of no more offering for sin.
Leviticus 4:20: And he shall do with the bullock as he did with the bullock for a sin offering, so shall he do with this: and the priest shall make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven them.
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:22
States that almost all things are purged with blood and without shedding of blood is no remission, implying the necessity of sacrifices contrary to Hebrews 10:18.
Hebrews 9:22: And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
This verse indicates the abolishment of the law's ordinances, but doesn't specifically reference sacrifices being ended, which contradicts the sense of finality in Hebrews 10:18.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Contradiction with Numbers 29:11
Levitical law requiring regular sin offerings contrasts with the notion in Hebrews 10:18 that no more offerings are needed.
Numbers 29:11: One kid of the goats [for] a sin offering; beside the sin offering of atonement, and the continual burnt offering, and the meat offering of it, and their drink offerings.
Contradiction with Exodus 29:36
The command for daily sin offerings opposes the idea in Hebrews 10:18 that further offerings for sin are unnecessary.
Exodus 29:36: And thou shalt offer every day a bullock [for] a sin offering for atonement: and thou shalt cleanse the altar, when thou hast made an atonement for it, and thou shalt anoint it, to sanctify it.