Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse encourages not resisting evil and turning the other cheek, whereas Hebrews 10:34 acknowledges accepting the spoiling of one's goods with joy, suggesting a passive endurance of wrongdoing rather than resistance or seeking justice.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
This verse similarly promotes offering the other cheek and not withholding clothing when asked, in contrast to Hebrews 10:34's emphasis on accepting personal loss due to faith.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Contradiction with James 1:2
This verse encourages counting trials as joy, aligning more with Hebrews 10:34's acceptance of suffering, but could be seen as contradicting if taken to emphasize dealing with trials internally rather than physical possessions being spoiled.
James 1:2: My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; [temptations: or, trials]
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
Contradicts Hebrews 10:34 by advising not to say "I will do to him as he hath done to me," even though both suggest restraint, they differ as this advocates non-retaliation for personal justice.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:19-20
Contradicts by emphasizing storing treasures in heaven rather than on earth, aligning more with Hebrews 10:34's acceptance of loss, but showcasing a different focus on spiritual wealth over physical endurance.
Matthew 6:19-20: Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding Hebrews 10:34 might involve differing interpretations of who the audience was, the specific historical context, or the timeline of events referenced. Scholars might debate whether the events and experiences described accurately match known historical records or if there are inconsistencies with other biblical accounts. However, specifics vary and are often debated among scholars.